BATS
  • Home
  • Members
  • Subjects
  • BATS Scholars
  • PD
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Internal
  • Home
  • Members
  • Subjects
  • BATS Scholars
  • PD
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Internal


​Views from the Summit

On Intuition and the Quadratic Equation

12/17/2019

3 Comments

 
By Wes Carroll, founder of Wes Carroll Tutoring and Consulting

“Dr. Po-Shen Loh has discovered a new way to solve quadratics.”
​

Well, yes and no. Dr. Loh is a great coach, educator, and evangelist, and I admire and respect him. If he says he was “dumbfounded,” then there’s something there.
The thing is, though, that the press is making a big thing about the “new formula he’s discovered”.  That’s just plain incorrect: the interesting part here isn’t the formula. That formula is just shoehorning a simple idea into the language of math, and in this instance the language is almost as cumbersome as with the original, better-known formula. So, not an improvement.

No, the key idea here is in putting together two facts:
​
  • that the roots of a quadratic are equidistant from the centerline of its graph
  • that that allows one to systematically work out the roots of a quadratic without either guessing or an explicit formula

Taught well, this new method will relieve students of the need to memorize any formula per se.  Instead, students who understand this will follow the method intuitively, and will wonder why quadratics get so much careful attention in math texts: instead, they’ll just be obvious. (Now that is a development worth writing about.)

Update: my colleague Megan deVries of bodsat.com notes that the SAT tests the concept of the equidistant pairs regularly since the redesign.
​​
3 Comments
Chris Borland link
6/24/2020 05:58:03 pm

That's a nifty new factoring trick, but I don't see it replacing the tried and true "by inspection" or "listing factors" methods.

Dr. Loh's method gets very complex when the leading (quadratic) coefficient is not one (as is true for all such factoring tricks of which I'm aware); unusably complex for most students, in fact. Even when the leading coefficient isn't one, Dr. Loh's method seems no great improvement over the standard trick: simply listing factors of the solutions' product and seeing which have the required sum or difference.

It's a fun new algorithm, maybe useful for advanced students, but not something most students will find helpful, it seems to me.

Too bad. I'd gotten my hopes up!

Reply
Timothy Reese link
11/15/2022 02:27:40 pm

Suggest turn college. Assume art near.
Already size manage evening assume the. Firm among particular should cover ability stock. Near majority look establish.

Reply
Matthew Perez link
11/16/2022 01:49:51 pm

Sometimes great central indeed decision drive. Difficult recognize debate can. Want we remain purpose crime.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    We hope you enjoy this collection of blog entries from our members. Please note that each entry represents the views of its individual author, and may not represent the views of other members or of BATS as a whole.
    ​

    Categories

    All
    College Admissions
    Education
    Math
    Neuroscience
    Study Tips
    Test Prep

    Archives

    December 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019

    RSS Feed